Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam...@au1.ibm.com> writes: > Always include a timeout when waiting for secondary cpus to enter OPAL > in the kexec path, rather than only when crashing.
This *sounds* reasonable... but I wonder what actual worse case could be and why we'd get stuck too long waiting for things? What was the original bug/problem that inspired this patch? and is 1s enough? _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
