On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 14:14 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > On 07/20/2015 11:46 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > So the pr_info()s should go entirely and the pr_debugs() should become > > pr_warns(). The warning messages should become more verbose so they stand on > > their own, ie. include the drc_index. > > > > When everything goes perfectly there should be no output. > > > > So... good idea, bad implementation :)
Well also a matter of perspective. For you these info messages are helpful because you're working on the cpu hotplug code. But for other folks they're just log spam. > I have a feeling I may have messed this up somewhere else in the patch set too > so I'll take a look at all the pr_* calls. OK thanks. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
