The pointer to an AFU in the adapter's list of AFUs can be null
if we're in the process of removing AFUs. The afu_list_lock
doesn't guard against this.

Say we have 2 slices, and we're in the process of removing cxl.
 - We remove the AFUs in order (see cxl_remove). In cxl_remove_afu
   for AFU 0, we take the lock, set adapter->afu[0] = NULL, and
   release the lock.
 - Then we get an slbia. In cxl_slbia we take the lock, and set
   afu = adapter->afu[0], which is NULL.
 - Therefore our attempt to check afu->enabled will blow up.

Therefore, check if afu is a null pointer before dereferencing it.

cc: STABLE
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net>
---
 drivers/misc/cxl/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c
index 11a2044d6b0f..5bcd676bfd59 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static inline void cxl_slbia_core(struct mm_struct *mm)
                spin_lock(&adapter->afu_list_lock);
                for (slice = 0; slice < adapter->slices; slice++) {
                        afu = adapter->afu[slice];
-                       if (!afu->enabled)
+                       if (!afu || !afu->enabled)
                                continue;
                        rcu_read_lock();
                        idr_for_each_entry(&afu->contexts_idr, ctx, id)
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to