On 06/19/2015 06:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 16:19 -0500, Brian King wrote: >> On 05/18/2015 01:40 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-18-05 at 03:56:51 UTC, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >>>> This patch adds the ability to the DMA direct ops to fallback to the IOMMU >>>> ops for coherent alloc/free if the coherent mask of the device isn't >>>> suitable for accessing the direct DMA space and the device also happens >>>> to have an active IOMMU table. >>> >>> Can you do the removal of the union, the #ifdef PPC64 and the static >>> inlines as >>> a precursor patch, that would remove some of the noise in the diff. >>> >>> And can you explain the changes to dart, pseries and powernv. >>> >>> There's also some whitespace changes in iommu.h that I assume you didn't >>> want? >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> Do you plan to resubmit with these changes? The patch seems to work fine in >> my testing. Would be nice to get this merged. > > Argh, completely forgot about it. I'll respin it next week.
Anything I can do to help on this one? Thanks, Brian -- Brian King Power Linux I/O IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
