On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 07:10:36PM +0300, Cristian Stoica wrote: > On 06/11/2015 06:38 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:42:00PM +0300, Cristian Stoica wrote: > > > > Why? > > > > This patch matches the input argument "size" of ioremap() with the output of > request_mem_region() (which is > resource_size_t). > Since the latter is used as input to the former, the types should match (even > though mapping more than 4G is not usually > expected). There are a lot of such differences in the code and this is an > attempt to reduce that.
No, why do I care about a ppc-only patch? There's nothing that I can do about this, please work with the proper maintainers and don't randomly poke people who have no responsibility about the code in question as it doesn't do any good. greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
