On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 11:30:32AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Why are your patches all as replies?
Because I cared too much about the threading and the series that the
"Re:" escaped me.
> > Implement ftrace on ppc64
>
> What do you mean "Implement ftrace on ppc64"? It's already implemented.
Sorry, too deep in the details. It's DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, actually.
Using gcc's -mprofile-kernel to call into ftrace...
> I'm not even going to bother looking at this patch because I have no
> idea what its purpose is.
Understandable ;-)
So: Implement DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, in order to prepare for live patching.
Other obvious things I forgot to mention?
Torsten
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
