On Wednesday 03 June 2015 06:24 AM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
+int64_t opal_nest_ima_control(uint32_t value);
If I'm understanding things correctly, you call this function in patch
3. Quoting from that patch:
+static void nest_init(void *dummy)
+{
+ opal_nest_ima_control(P8_NEST_ENGINE_START);
+}
Does this patch need to be moved earlier in the series?
I applied all the patches together and tested it since the Makefile
inclusion is
the final patch in the series. I guess it is better rearrange the series.
Have you tested that the series compiles at every point?
(I've found that this can be done quite easily with
git rebase --interactive using x to run the compile)
Nice. will try this out.
Thanks for the review
Maddy
+
/* Internal functions */
extern int early_init_dt_scan_opal(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
int depth, void *data);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S
index a7ade94..ce36a68 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S
@@ -295,3 +295,4 @@ OPAL_CALL(opal_i2c_request,
OPAL_I2C_REQUEST);
OPAL_CALL(opal_flash_read, OPAL_FLASH_READ);
OPAL_CALL(opal_flash_write, OPAL_FLASH_WRITE);
OPAL_CALL(opal_flash_erase, OPAL_FLASH_ERASE);
+OPAL_CALL(opal_nest_ima_control, OPAL_NEST_IMA_CONTROL);
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
