On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 03:23 -0500, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [2/4,v3] powerpc/fsl-booke: Add T1024 QDS board
> > support
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:07:43PM +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> > > + flash@2{
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > > + compatible = "eon,en25s64"; /* 8MB */
> > > + reg = <2>;
> > > + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
> > > + };
> >
> > AFAICT the vendor is phyton, not eon.
>
> How do you think the vendor is phyton?
> Per en25s64 data sheet, it's really EON (Eon Silicon Solution, Inc,
> www.eonssi.com)
I'm not sure. The search results for it look a bit different from
what I remember seeing last week. I'll fix it.
> I had sent a patch for EON http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/367810/
> last year.
> There is no 'phyton' in binding document.
There is no binding document. As for vendor-prefixes, you should ping
to get that patch merged -- and when you're depending on an unmerged
patch (even if just documentation), please mention it below the ---
line when submitting.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
