On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:24:25AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:13:45PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Nicolin, > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nicolin Chen <nicoleots...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > Is that possible for you to provisionally revert this patch? > > > I wanted to wait for the test result from Fabio or Zidan in > > > the Cc list because I don't have a test environment for SPDIF > > > even though this change seems to make sense. > > > > I currently don't have access to a SPDIF receiver to test it. > > Okay, let's wait for Zidan then. We only need to test the > playback route of supporting sample rates. > > Thanks > Nicolin I don't have the board which supported by community to test spdif out. So i used the imx7 board and test it with internal branch. I found that (txclk_df + 1) is better than txclk_df. I suspect the patch for clk_round_rate() is not in our branch. Could you please tell me which patch is for clk_round_rate? I want to cherry-pick it to our branch and test it.
Best Regards, Zidan Wang _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
