Am 15.05.2015 um 16:27 schrieb Alex Bennée: > index ef1a5fc..aca4f86 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > @@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ struct kvm_fpu { > __u64 fprs[16]; > }; > > -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP 0x00010000 > -
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > index 70ac641..7c5dd11 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h [...] > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP (1 << 16) > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP (1 << 17) This is a abi break for s390, no? David do you remember why we did not use SW_BP? _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev