On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:15:58PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:54:12PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:21:04PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:07:31PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>>This patch caches the index of a VF in its PF in pci_dn.
>>>>
>>>
>>>At least you can mention the purpose of vf_index to make the commit log
>>>complete. The following message looks better?
>>>
>>>The patch caches the VF index in pci_dn, which can be used to calculate
>>>VF's bus, device and function number. Those information helps to locate
>>>the VF's PCI device instance when doing hotplug during EEH recovery if
>>>necessary.
>>>
>>
>>Thanks, looks better. I added it in the log.
>>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>---
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 1 +
>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 5 +++--
>>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>index 1811c44..9582aa2 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ struct pci_dn {
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>> u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
>>>> u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
>>>>+ int vf_index; /* Index to PF for VF dev */
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> /* VF index in the PF */
>>
>>Ok, changed in the code.
>>
>>>
>>>And I believe it can be "unsigned int", or u16. We should have
>>>non-negative vf_index, no?
>>
>>Take a look in the virtfn_add(), the index in drivers/pci/iov.c is int. So I
>>copy that.
>>
>>>
>>>> int offset; /* PE# for the first VF PE */
>>>> #define M64_PER_IOV 4
>>>> int m64_per_iov;
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>>>index b3b4df9..bf0fb873 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>>>@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_get_pdn(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>> static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent,
>>>>- struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>>+ struct pci_dev *pdev, int vf_index,
>>>
>>> struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>> int vf_index;
>>
>>Some reason for this comment?
>>
>>That does not exceed 80 characters.
>>
>
>No, it doesn't exceed 80 characters as you said. You take one of the following
>formats, not the one you're using:
>
>add_one_dev_pci_data(foo1, foo2, add_one_dev_pci_data(foo1,
> foo3, foo4, foo2,
> foo5, foo6); :
> foo6);
>
Thanks
>>>> int busno, int devfn)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>>@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct
>>>>pci_dn *parent,
>>>> pdn->parent = parent;
>>>> pdn->busno = busno;
>>>> pdn->devfn = devfn;
>>>>+ pdn->vf_index = vf_index;
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
>>>> pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>> #endif
>>>>@@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> return NULL;
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) {
>>>>- pdn = add_one_dev_pci_data(parent, NULL,
>>>>+ pdn = add_one_dev_pci_data(parent, NULL, i,
>>>> pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i),
>>>> pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i));
>>>> if (!pdn) {
>
>Thanks,
>Gavin
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
