On 04/27/2015 04:45 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 04/27/2015 11:53 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 09:24 +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> I was not aware that some other entity than the driver could be >>> interested in the information provided by DT node. I will no longer >>> object, provided that we will get an ack from DT maintainer. >>
Jacket, >> My understanding is that we no longer need bindings to be accepted by DT >> maintainers. > > I've just skimmed through the patches in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc and they indeed don't have > acks from DT maintainers. Sure.. I have addressed all other issues we discussed earlier. Will respin v4 soon. > >> That being said, I would like to review this one before it is accepted, >> as I haven't had a chance to do so yet :-) (I was mostly responding to >> you, I haven't caught up with the full thread yet). >> >> Please wait for an ack from myself or Michael Ellerman (the two powerpc >> maintainers). Either that or provide your ack and we'll merge it via our >> tree if we are happy with it. > > Since this driver is for LED subsystem it should better go via leds tree. > Sure.. Will send v4 and request benh/mpe to review/ack from powerpc side. -Vasant _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
