On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 13:33 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 19:41 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > The only little endian configuration we support is ppc64le, so we > > shouldn't be asking which endian to use when building 32-bit kernels, > > they are always big endian. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > index 7264e91190be..12fc443b9d54 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN > > > > config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN > > bool "Build little endian kernel" > > + depends on PPC64 > > select PPC64_BOOT_WRAPPER > > help > > Build a little endian kernel. > > Shouldn't this be PPC_BOOK3S_64?
Ah yeah, stupid BOOKE :) Currently it's nothing so PPC64 was an improvement, but you're right, if we're building 64-bit BOOKE then we shouldn't prompt. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
