On 21 April 2015 at 16:45, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2015 16:36:13 Baolin Wang wrote:
> > On 21 April 2015 at 04:48, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > > /* Set clock_realtime */
> > > > static int posix_clock_realtime_set(const clockid_t which_clock,
> > > > - const struct timespec *tp)
> > > > + const struct timespec64 *tp)
> > > > {
> > > > - return do_sys_settimeofday(tp, NULL);
> > > > + struct timespec ts = timespec64_to_timespec(*tp);
> > > > +
> > > > + return do_sys_settimeofday(&ts, NULL);
> > >
> > > Sigh. No. We first provide a proper function for this, which takes a
> > > timespec64, i.e. do_sys_settimeofday64() instead of having this
> > > wrapper mess all over the place.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for your comments,but if use do_sys_settimeofday64() here that
> > will introduce
> > a security bug: do_sys_settimeofday contains a capability
> > check that normally prevents non-root users from setting the time.
> >
> > With your change, any user can set the system time.
>
> He was asking for a new do_sys_settimeofday64 function to be added,
> not using the low-level do_settimeofday64.
>
> Arnd
>
Sorry for the misunderstand, i'll fix that in next patch. Thanks.
--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
