On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 06:10 -0500, Liberman Igal-B31950 wrote: > > > Regards, > Igal Liberman. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:42 AM > > To: Liberman Igal-B31950 > > Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/dts: Move pll0/1-div4 index > > > > On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 15:08 +0300, Igal.Liberman wrote: > > > From: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com> > > > > > > This patch updates pll0/1-div4 index to '3'. > > > Originally it was '2'. > > > > > > The following patch adds pll0/1-div3 option: > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461151/ > > > After this patch, index '2' becomes pll0/1-div3. > > > > > > This patch based on top of the following: > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461811/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com> > > > > This needs to be done in the same patch as the provider change, to avoid a > > buggy intermediate state. > > > > Will there be a new binding patch coming? > > > > OK, I'll add those changes as on patch. > > Regarding the binding, > I already submitted https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461150/
Which is an incompatible change as I noted in a comment on a different patch. > Do you mean that I should add comment that the driver parses the node by > reading the number of input clocks and not the compatible? No, you should make the binding document reflect how things currently work. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
