On 13/04/2015 16:32, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>>> I initially thought it would be enough to put it into >>>> <asm-generic/mmu_context.h>, expecting it works as >>>> <asm-generic/pgtable.h>. But that's not the case. >>>> >>>> It probably worth at some point rework all <asm/mmu_context.h> to include >>>> <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> at the end as we do for <asm/pgtable.h>. >>>> But that's outside the scope of the patchset, I guess. >>>> >>>> I don't see any better candidate for such dummy header. :-/ >>> >>> Clearly, I'm not confortable with a rewrite of <asm/mmu_context.h> :( >>> >>> So what about this patch, is this v3 acceptable ? >> >> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> > > Other than the #ifdef thing, the same: > > Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xe...@parallels.com> >
Thanks Kirill and Pavel. Should I send a new version fixing the spaces around the plus sign ? Cheers, Laurent. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
