On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 09:19 +0300, Igal.Liberman wrote: > From: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com> > > Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/guts.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/guts.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/guts.txt > index 7f150b5..e4f0ac2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/guts.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/guts.txt > @@ -9,6 +9,20 @@ Required properties: > > - compatible : Should define the compatible device type for > global-utilities. > + Possible compatibles: > + "fsl,qoriq-device-config-1.0" > + "fsl,p2041-device-config" > + "fsl,p3041-device-config" > + "fsl,p4080-device-config" > + "fsl,p5020-device-config" > + "fsl,p5040-device-config" > + "fsl,qoriq-device-config-2.0" > + "fsl,b4860-device-config" > + "fsl,b4420-device-config" > + "fsl,b4-device-config" > + "fsl,t1040-device-config" > + "fsl,t2080-device-config" > + "fsl,t4240-device-config"
There's no need to list every chip here. Just list the ones that aren't chips, plus "fsl,<chip>-device-config". As for fsl,b4-device-config, does that exist in any final dtb (as opposed to b4si-post.dtsi)? The b4420 and b4860 dtsi files both overwrite that compatible. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
