On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 10:19 +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > Le 25/03/2015 01:45, Scott Wood a écrit : > > On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 10:34 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> You'll need to collect ACKs, or get the individual patches merged, and > >> then we > >> can take patch 8 through the powerpc tree once those are all in - probably > >> for > >> 4.2. > > It looks like CONFIG_8xx is used a lot more than CONFIG_PPC_8xx, so it > > would be less churn to get rid of the latter (plus, we also have > > CONFIG_4xx, CONFIG_6xx, etc). The only use of PPC_8xx I see outside > > arch/powerpc is in drivers/watchdog/Kconfig. > > Ok, we can do that. But when outside of arch/powerpc/, isn't is more > explicit with CONFIG_PPC_8xx rather that CONFIG_8xx ?
Yes, CONFIG_PPC_8xx is a better name, but churn and consistency matter as well. > Now that I have submitted the first set of patch, don't we have a risk > that now it is already merged by some other maintainers ? Sigh. I see a couple in linux-next. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
