Peter Zijlstra [pet...@infradead.org] wrote:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:35:05AM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| > In addition to using the transaction interface to schedule events
| > on a PMU, we will use it to also read a group of counters at once.
| > Accordingly, add a flags parameter to the transaction interfaces.
| > The flags indicate wheether the transaction is to add events to
| > the PMU (PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD) or to read the events PERF_PMU_TXN_READ.
| >
| > Based on input from Peter Zijlstra.
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
| > ---
| > arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
| > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
| > include/linux/perf_event.h | 14 +++++++++++---
| > kernel/events/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
| > 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
|
| s390 and sparc also implement the txn.
Yes, I have fixed that now. Was mostly exploring the basic txn interface.
|
| # git grep "\.start_txn"
| arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c: .start_txn = power_pmu_start_txn,
| arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c: .start_txn = cpumf_pmu_start_txn,
| arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c: .start_txn = sparc_pmu_start_txn,
| arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c: .start_txn =
x86_pmu_start_txn,
|
| Also; you add the flag to all 3 calls; does it make sense to only pass
| it to the first and save the txn type in the txn state itself? We could
| add PERF_EVENT_TXN_READ for this..
We could do that. The one small downside I see with passing the txn flag
only ot ->start_txn() is that checks like this become more complicated,
even in PMUs that don't care about the TXN_READ transactions.
@@ -1619,8 +1622,11 @@ static void x86_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
* Clear the flag and pmu::enable() will perform the
* schedulability test.
*/
-static void x86_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
+static void x86_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu, int flags)
{
+ if (flags & ~PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD)
+ return;
+
The ->start_txn will need to save the transaction type in the
architecture's 'cpuhw' and check/clear in ->commit_txn() and
->clear_txn() - right ?
Sukadev
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
