Oh, I thought you are not comfortable with the "Patch v12 10/21 PCI:
Consider additional PF's IOV BAR alignment ..."
V14 is ready to send which is based on v4.0-rc1.
2015-03-19 23:08 GMT+08:00 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:15:17AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:19:07PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> > >> On PHB3, PF IOV BAR will be covered by M64 window to have better PE
> > >> isolation. The total_pe number is usually different from total_VFs,
> which
> > >> can lead to a conflict between MMIO space and the PE number.
> > >>
> > >> For example, if total_VFs is 128 and total_pe is 256, the second half
> of
> > >> M64 window will be part of other PCI device, which may already belong
> > >> to other PEs.
> > >>
> > >> Prevent the conflict by reserving additional space for the PF IOV BAR,
> > >> which is total_pe number of VF's BAR size.
> > >>
> > >> [bhelgaas: make dev_printk() output more consistent, index resource[]
> > >> conventionally]
> > >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h | 4 ++
> > >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 3 ++
> > >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 5 +++
> > >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c | 4 ++
> > >> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 61
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
> > >> index c8175a3..965547c 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
> > >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
> > >> @@ -250,6 +250,10 @@ struct machdep_calls {
> > >> /* Reset the secondary bus of bridge */
> > >> void (*pcibios_reset_secondary_bus)(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > >>
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> > >> + void (*pcibios_fixup_sriov)(struct pci_bus *bus);
> > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
> > >> +
> > >> /* Called to shutdown machine specific hardware not already
> controlled
> > >> * by other drivers.
> > >> */
> > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> > >> index 513f8f2..de11de7 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> > >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> > >> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ struct pci_dn {
> > >> #define IODA_INVALID_PE (-1)
> > >> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
> > >> int pe_number;
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> > >> + u16 max_vfs; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expended
> */
> > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
> > >> #endif
> > >> struct list_head child_list;
> > >> struct list_head list;
> > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > >> index 8203101..022e9fe 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> > >> @@ -1646,6 +1646,11 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller
> *hose)
> > >> if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb)
> > >> ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb(hose);
> > >>
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> > >> + if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov)
> > >> + ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov(bus);
> > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
> > >
> > >Here, and ...
> > >
> > >> +
> > >> /* Configure PCI Express settings */
> > >> if (bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> > >> struct pci_bus *child;
> > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
> > >> index 5b78917..7d238ae 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
> > >> @@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ void pcibios_add_pci_devices(struct pci_bus * bus)
> > >> */
> > >> slotno = PCI_SLOT(PCI_DN(dn->child)->devfn);
> > >> pci_scan_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(slotno, 0));
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> > >> + if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov)
> > >> + ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov(bus);
> > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
> > >
> > >here, you have the same code. It's good that we now do it for hot-added
> > >devices as well as those present at boot. But it's bad that it happens
> in
> > >two different paths.
> > >
> > >Isn't there some way we can unify this so the same path is used for the
> > >initial pcibios_scan_phb() and also the hot-add case? Maybe call
> > >pcibios_fixup_sriov() from pcibios_add_device()?
> > >
> >
> >
> > This is a very good suggestion. I have changed this and works fine.
>
> I was expecting a v14 series with this change. Is it coming, or are you
> waiting for something else from me?
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
--
Richard Yang
Help You, Help Me
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
