On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:13:46PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:17:31AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>As the comment indicates, powernv_eeh_get_state() will inform EEH core to
>>delay 1 second. This means the delay doesn't happen when
>>powernv_eeh_get_state() returns.
>>
>>This patch moves the delay subtraction just before msleep(), which is the
>>same logic in pseries_eeh_wait_state().
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>The patch would conflict with the patches to remove EEH chip layer done
>in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/439956/. Could you please repost
>with corrected function names in commit log when the dependent patches
>show up in Michael's next branch?
>
>Except that, the changes look ok to me:
>
>Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks, I will repost it accordingly.
>
>Thanks,
>Gavin
>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>index 5abb4c2..af1be8f 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>>@@ -334,13 +334,13 @@ static int powernv_eeh_wait_state(struct eeh_pe *pe,
>>int max_wait)
>> if (ret != EEH_STATE_UNAVAILABLE)
>> return ret;
>>
>>- max_wait -= mwait;
>> if (max_wait <= 0) {
>> pr_warn("%s: Timeout getting PE#%x's state (%d)\n",
>> __func__, pe->addr, max_wait);
>> return EEH_STATE_NOT_SUPPORT;
>> }
>>
>>+ max_wait -= mwait;
>> msleep(mwait);
>> }
>>
>>--
>>1.7.9.5
>>
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
