It makes no sense to use a variant lock token on a platform which doesn't support for shared-processor logical partitions. Actually we can eliminate a memory load by using a fixed lock token on these platforms.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haoke...@gmail.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h index 4dbe072eecbe..d303cdad2519 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ #define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() smp_mb() /* Full ordering for lock. */ -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR /* use 0x800000yy when locked, where yy == CPU number */ #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ #define LOCK_TOKEN (*(u32 *)(&get_paca()->lock_token)) @@ -187,9 +187,13 @@ extern void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock); #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 #define __DO_SIGN_EXTEND "extsw %0,%0\n" -#define WRLOCK_TOKEN LOCK_TOKEN /* it's negative */ #else #define __DO_SIGN_EXTEND +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR +#define WRLOCK_TOKEN LOCK_TOKEN /* it's negative */ +#else #define WRLOCK_TOKEN (-1) #endif -- 2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev