Excerpts from Rasmus Villemoes's message of 2015-02-21 00:26:22 +1100: > C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits > or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation, > however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also > says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be > printed. Even if the kernel followed C99 to the letter, I don't think > that would be particularly useful in these cases, so just remove the > precision specifiers.
Nice catch Rasmus, but I think a better patch would be one that adds the missing precision (%.16llx). Cheers, -Ian _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
