Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > The device tree now exposes the residency values for different idle states. > Read > these values instead of calculating residency from the latency values. The > values > exposed in the DT are validated for optimal power efficiency. However to > maintain > compatibility with the older firmware code which does not expose residency > values, use default values as a fallback mechanism. While at it, use better > APIs to parse the powermgmt device tree node so as to avoid endianness > transformation. > > Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Same acked-by as before, from perspective of "I merged the firmware side of things" and things look godo in relation to firmware PoV. Acked-by: Stewart Smith <stew...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
