On 01/28/2015 12:53 AM, Ian Munsie wrote:
Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-01-28 16:04:40 +1100:
I just wanted to check the status of this one? I can't see it in your
tree and wanted to make sure you didn't simply miss it.

It looked fishy, but I never got around to replying.

The second sentence in the explanation should never be true:

Right, that was the point of the fix ;)

You shouldn't have np unless you did an of_node_get() to get it, otherwise it's
pointing at something you don't have a reference for and it might go away at
any time.

So the patch may fix the bug but I don't think it's correct.

I think pnv_pci_to_phb_node() should be doing a get for you, before returning
the pointer.

Agreed - we should probably also rename it to have 'get' in the name,
like pnv_pci_get_phb_node().

Yeah, that's way better than the current patch.


See as a comparison pcibios_get_phb_of_node().

We could almost use that instead, except it's not exported for modules
and I'm not sure if that even works with __weak functions?


Ryan - do you want to respin this, or would you rather I take it?

Sure, I'll respin and resend as a bug fix.

-Ryan


Cheers,
-Ian


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to