Hello Shao-Hui,
On 01/03/2015 10:58 PM, Xie Shaohui-B21989 wrote: > Hello Emil, > > The patches sent by Shruti were marked as "Changes Requested" over 5 months. > to me if the patches do need changes, the possible changes seems not in > 'config' but in corenet_generic.c. It was part of a series that needed changes in other patches > I'm not sure if it's OK to add some compatibles in corenet_generic.c. if we > can use the existing compatible "simple-bus", > Then we will only need to enable MDIO mux option in config without adding > compatible in corenet_generic.c. The container "bus" of the "muxing" nodes doesn't carry the "simple-bus" compatible and (as per the ePAPR definition) I'm unsure it would be applicable Cheers, > Best Regards, > Shaohui Xie > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Emil Medve [mailto:emilian.me...@freescale.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 4:43 PM >> To: shh....@gmail.com; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421 >> Cc: Andy Fleming; Xie Shaohui-B21989; Kanetkar Shruti-B44454 >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/config: enable mdio buses muxing via >> Memory-mapped device >> >> Hello Shao-Hui, >> >> >> On 12/22/2014 03:21 AM, shh....@gmail.com wrote: >>> From: Andy Fleming <aflem...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <aflem...@gmail.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <shaohui....@freescale.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/configs/corenet32_smp_defconfig | 1 + >>> arch/powerpc/configs/corenet64_smp_defconfig | 1 + >>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> Shruti submitted a more complete version of this patch here: >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/370873 >> >> We should stick with that version >> >> >> Cheers, _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
