On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 08:50:04PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 10:25 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:19:36PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 02:45 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > The new driver is around for more than 2 years now, so the old one can > > > > go. Getting rid of it helps the removal of the legacy .attach_adapter > > > > callback of the I2C subsystem. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> > > > > > > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > > > > Thanks! I can take it via my I2C tree, but I'd think it makes more sense > > if you take it via ppc? What do you prefer? > > Either works. These days Michael Ellerman handles the day to day > maintainance of the powerpc tree so it's his choice but if you need this > as a dependency on your subsequent API removal it's probably better that > you take it.
So, I haven't seen this coming in via ppc. I am going to send another pull request to Linus tomorrow and will include it unless somebody objects soon.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
