> > Oh, I thought we agreed that you take it via powerpc. I still think this > > is the best solution. > > I threatened to do that :-) I don't remember you replying, did I miss > it ?
It is here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/20762/focus=21099 > If you are ok with the driver and are happy for me to take it, > please send an Ack. "Happy" is not the correct word, but let's just go over with it. Maybe like this: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> (I2C part, excluding the bindings) > From a binding perspective, it's just a piece of additional info that > the firmware provides for convenience. I do understand the use case. I even agree it makes sense to have something like this. It is just that I'd prefer a generic, widely acknowledged solution, with consensus where it belongs and how it should be named. Not a custom solution which, frankly, feels forced on me by time pressure I have nothing to do with. So, not happy here, but also not looking for drama. Let's move on...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
