On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:53:37PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes: > > > On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 12:57 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> Now, hash_preload can possibly insert an hpte in hash page table even if > >> the access is not allowed by the pte permissions. But i guess even that > >> is ok. because we will fault again, end-up calling hash_page_mm where we > >> handle that part correctly. > > > > I think we need a test case... > > > > I ran the subpageprot test that Paul had written. I modified it to ran > with selftest. >
It's implied but can I assume it passed? If so, Ben and Paul, can I consider the series to be acked by you other than the minor comment updates? Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
