On 11/29/2014 04:08 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-23-09 at 03:53:54 UTC, Mahesh Salgaonkar wrote:
>> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mah...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> The flush_tlb hook in cpu_spec was introduced as a generic function hook
>> to invalidate TLBs. But the current implementation of flush_tlb hook
>> takes IS (invalidation selector) as an argument which is architecture
>> dependent. Hence, It is not right to have a generic routine where caller
>> has to pass non-generic argument.
>>
>> This patch fixes this and makes flush_tlb hook as high level API.
>>
>> The old code used to call flush_tlb hook with IS=0 (single page) resulting
>> partial invalidation of TLBs which is not right. This fix now makes
>> sure that whole TLB is invalidated to be able to successfully recover from
>> TLB and ERAT errors.
> 
> Which old code? You mean the MCE code I think. That's a bug fix, so it should
> be a separate patch.

Yes. MCE code. Since this patch re-factors the code that takes IS as
direct argument, having a separate fix patch does not make any sense and
would get overwritten by this patch anyway.

> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h 
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
>> index daa5af9..ae3e74f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ struct cpu_spec {
>>      /*
>>       * Processor specific routine to flush tlbs.
>>       */
>> -    void            (*flush_tlb)(unsigned long inval_selector);
>> +    void            (*flush_tlb)(unsigned int action);
>>  
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-hash64.h 
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-hash64.h
>> index d765144..068ac8b 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-hash64.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-hash64.h
>> @@ -112,6 +112,11 @@
>>  #define TLBIEL_INVAL_SET_SHIFT      12
>>  
>>  #define POWER7_TLB_SETS             128     /* # sets in POWER7 TLB */
>> +#define POWER8_TLB_SETS             512     /* # sets in POWER8 TLB */
>> +
>> +/* TLB flush actions. Used as argument to cpu_spec.flush_tlb() hook */
>> +#define FLUSH_TLB_ALL               0       /* invalidate all TLBs */
>> +#define FLUSH_TLB_LPID              1       /* invalidate TLBs for current 
>> LPID */
> 
> Now that these are generic actions then they should go in cputable.h with the
> flush hook.

Sure, I will move them.

> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> index 4673353..9c9b741 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> @@ -137,15 +137,11 @@ __init_HFSCR:
>>  /*
>>   * Clear the TLB using the specified IS form of tlbiel instruction
>>   * (invalidate by congruence class). P7 has 128 CCs., P8 has 512.
>> - *
>> - * r3 = IS field
>>   */
>>  __init_tlb_power7:
>> -    li      r3,0xc00        /* IS field = 0b11 */
>> -_GLOBAL(__flush_tlb_power7)
>>      li      r6,128
>>      mtctr   r6
>> -    mr      r7,r3           /* IS field */
>> +    li      r7,0xc00        /* IS field = 0b11 */
>>      ptesync
>>  2:  tlbiel  r7
>>      addi    r7,r7,0x1000
> 
> So the current version is:
> 
> _GLOBAL(__flush_tlb_power7)
>       li      r6,128
>       mtctr   r6
>       mr      r7,r3           /* IS field */
>       ptesync
> 2:    tlbiel  r7
>       addi    r7,r7,0x1000
>       bdnz    2b
>       ptesync
> 1:    blr
> 
> ie. a loop preceeded and followed by ptesync.
> 
> Your new version is:
> 
>> +static void _flush_tlb(uint32_t tlb_set, unsigned long inval_selector)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long i, rb;
>> +
>> +    rb = inval_selector;
>> +    for (i = 0; i < tlb_set; i++) {
>> +            asm volatile("tlbiel %0" : : "r" (rb));
>> +            rb += 1 << TLBIEL_INVAL_SET_SHIFT;
>> +    }
>> +}
> 
> ie. no ptesyncs at all.
> 
> But there's no mention of that in the changelog. You need to explain why it is
> OK to drop the ptesyncs.

You are right. I should put ptesyncs in _flush_tlb(). Will make this
change in v2. Thanks for catching this.

> 
>> +/*
>> + * Generic routine to flush TLB on power7. This routine is used as
>> + * flush_tlb hook in cpu_spec for Power7 processor.
>> + *
>> + * action => FLUSH_TLB_ALL:  Invalidate all TLBs.
>> + *       FLUSH_TLB_LPID: Invalidate TLB for current LPID.
>> + */
>> +void __flush_tlb_power7(unsigned int action)
>> +{
>> +    switch (action) {
>> +    case FLUSH_TLB_ALL:
>> +            _flush_tlb(POWER7_TLB_SETS, TLBIEL_INVAL_SET);
>> +            break;
>> +    case FLUSH_TLB_LPID:
>> +            _flush_tlb(POWER7_TLB_SETS, TLBIEL_INVAL_SET_LPID);
>> +            break;
>> +    default:
>> +            break;
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Generic routine to flush TLB on power8. This routine is used as
>> + * flush_tlb hook in cpu_spec for power8 processor.
>> + *
>> + * action => FLUSH_TLB_ALL:  Invalidate all TLBs.
>> + *       FLUSH_TLB_LPID: Invalidate TLB for current LPID.
>> + */
>> +void __flush_tlb_power8(unsigned int action)
>> +{
>> +    switch (action) {
>> +    case FLUSH_TLB_ALL:
>> +            _flush_tlb(POWER8_TLB_SETS, TLBIEL_INVAL_SET);
>> +            break;
>> +    case FLUSH_TLB_LPID:
>> +            _flush_tlb(POWER8_TLB_SETS, TLBIEL_INVAL_SET_LPID);
>> +            break;
>> +    default:
>> +            break;
>> +    }
>> +}
> 
> How about this:
> 
> void flush_tlb_206(unsigned num_sets, unsigned int action)
> {
>       unsigned long rb;
>       int i;
> 
>       switch (action) {
>       case FLUSH_TLB_ALL:
>               rb = TLBIEL_INVAL_SET;
>               break;
>       case FLUSH_TLB_LPID:
>               rb = TLBIEL_INVAL_SET_LPID;
>               break;
>       default:
>               BUG();
>       }
> 
>       for (i = 0; i < num_sets; i++) {
>               asm volatile("tlbiel %0" : : "r" (rb));
>               rb += 1 << TLBIEL_INVAL_SET_SHIFT;
>       }
> }
> 
> void flush_tlb_power8(unsigned int action)
> {
>       flush_tlb_206(POWER8_TLB_SETS, action);
> }
> 
> void flush_tlb_power7(unsigned int action)
> {
>       flush_tlb_206(POWER7_TLB_SETS, action);
> }
> 

Agree. Will roll out v2 with above suggested changes.

Thanks,
-Mahesh.

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to