On Mon, 2014-24-11 at 22:26:59 UTC, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The flag passed to ioda_eeh_phb_reset() should be EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE,
> which is translated to OPAL_DEASSERT_RESET or something else by the
> EEH backend accordingly.
>
> The patch replaces OPAL_DEASSERT_RESET with EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE for
> ioda_eeh_phb_reset().
What is the symptom? Does it not work at all or is it just a cosmetic issue?
ie. should I send this to Linus ASAP or can it wait for the next release.
Looks like this went in as 361f2a2a1536 ("powrpc/powernv: Reset PHB in kdump
kernel") in 3.16. Should it go to stable?
cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
