> > > > If we're going to change the device tree I'd rather just add a property > > to say what the prescaler is. > > We would however, leave the boards' device trees that use things like > "fsl,mpc8543-i2c" as is and introduce the prescaler for the others requiring > it. > > > Now the drawback is that the driver would require a change, to parse this > prescaler new prescaler property. Would this be OK from your point of view > Wolfram ? If yes, I will send the patches for it.
I don't think it is OK. I'd think it can be deduced from the compatible property. Let's ask the DT experts here. I'll follow their suggestion.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
