On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 08:15 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote: > On 11/05/2014 09:38 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > > Corey & Michael: if this is acceptable, it may be mergable as two > > separate patches - one for the IPMI subsystem, one for the powernv > > platform. However, we'd need to preserve their order: patch 2/2 depends > > on 1/2, which provides the structure & function definitions. This'll > > break the build if only 2/2 is in the tree, and CONFIG_IPMI_POWERNV is > > set. > > > > Alternatively, they could be merged by one maintainer, pending an ack > > from the other. > > I'm fine either way.
How about the third option? :) I've put patch 1 in a topic branch: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mpe/linux.git/log/?h=topic/opal-ipmi And will merge that into my next, probably by tomorrow. If you merge the topic branch and then apply patch 2/2, then it should all go in without any hiccups. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
