On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:05:18PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 01:55:23PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 11:42 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>> index 4a45ba8..403445e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ int eeh_pci_enable(struct eeh_pe *pe, int function)
>>> int pcibios_set_pcie_reset_state(struct pci_dev *dev, enum
>>> pcie_reset_state state)
>>> {
>>> struct eeh_dev *edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(dev);
>>> - struct eeh_pe *pe = edev->pe;
>>> + struct eeh_pe *pe = edev ? edev->pe : NULL;
>>>
>>> if (!pe) {
>>> pr_err("%s: No PE found on PCI device %s\n",
>>
>>
>>We seem to do this or something similar in a few places. Is it worth having a
>>pci_dev_to_eeh_pe() inline?
>>
>
>Yes, maybe we just need a eeh_dev_to_pe() because converting
>pci_dev to eeh_dev is already coverred by pci_dev_to_eeh_dev().
>
>With eeh_dev_to_pe(), it looks like this:
>
>struct pci_dev *pdev;
>struct eeh_dev *edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(pdev);
>struct eeh_pe *pe = eeh_dev_to_pe(edev);
>
>Or another case:
>
>struct device_node *dn;
>struct eeh_dev *edev = of_node_to_eeh_dev(dn);
>struct eeh_pe *pe = eeh_dev_to_pe(edev);
With these helper, it would be more consolidate to jump between those data.
Gavin,
You would add these helpers? Or would like me to add them?
>
>Thanks,
>Gavin
>
>>cheers
>>
>>
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
