On 09/04/2014 10:08 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/04/2014 05:59 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: >> I have no idea how prevalent the ev56 is compared to the ev5. >> Still we're talking about a chip that came out in 1996. > > Ah yes, I stand corrected. According to Wikipedia, the affected CPUs > were all the 2106x CPUs (EV4, EV45, LCA4, LCA45) plus the 21164 with no > suffix (EV5). However, we're still talking about museum pieces here. > > I wonder what the one I have in my garage is... I'm sure I could emulate > it faster, though.
Which is a bit ironic because I remember when Digital had a team working on emulating native x86 apps on Alpha/NT. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
