Hi David, On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:33 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Nice catch. We changed 'flags' from u64 to "unsigned int" in the last > revision of the series. Patch looks good, but I'd prefer using > "unsigned int" as type, instead of __u32. Just to be consistent with > the syscall interface. The return type of F_GET_SEALS is actually > "int" and the MSB is reserved for signed error codes, so you can > savely use "int r = fcntl(fd, F_GET_SEALS, 0)" in > mfd_assert_get_seals(). >
OK. Should I send a new patch with these changes or do you have one line up already? -- Pranith _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
