On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:45:27AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:32:05PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > From: Nicolin Chen <guangyu.c...@freescale.com> > > > > SAI supports these operation modes: > > 1) asynchronous mode > > Both Tx and Rx are set to be asynchronous. > > 2) synchronous mode (Rx sync with Tx) > > Tx is set to be asynchronous, Rx is set to be synchronous. > > 3) synchronous mode (Tx sync with Rx) > > Rx is set to be asynchronous, Tx is set to be synchronous. > > 4) synchronous mode (Tx/Rx sync with another SAI's Tx) > > 5) synchronous mode (Tx/Rx sync with another SAI's Rx) > > This seems to conflict with something else on my branch - not checked > what. Can you take a look please?
Ah...there is another patch that should haven been merged into for-next is currently missing on the remote branch. This one: http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2014-August/079689.html > > +Note: > > +- If both fsl,sai-asynchronous and fsl,sai-synchronous-rx are absent, the > > + default synchronous mode (sync Rx with Tx) will be used, which means both > > + transimitter and receiver will send and receive data by following clocks > > + of transimitter. > > +- fsl,sai-asynchronous will be ignored if fsl,sai-synchronous-rx property > > is > > + already present. > > Might be worth printing an error here. Hmm...Do I need to send a v2? Thank you Nicolin _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
