On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 18:47 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
You need a much better changeset here, explaining what you are protecting against and why just changing that one list_add is sufficient. Cheers, Ben. > --- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c > b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c > index 54cf9bc..516f2ee 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm, > kvm_get_kvm(kvm); > > mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); > - list_add(&stt->list, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables); > + list_add_rcu(&stt->list, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables); > > mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
