On 06/25/2014 07:49 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Guenter,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:27:47AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Maybe the author's intention was:
static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void) __attribute__((const));
?
This specifies that the function has no side effects and the return value
only depends on the (here non-existing) function arguments.
Possibly, but either I am missing something or this doesn't compile.
You need to do a separate declaration:
static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void) __attribute__((const));
static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void)
{
...
Actually turns out one can use __attribute_const__, and it is
static inline int __attribute_const__ cpu_corepower_flags(void)
which turns out to be widely used.
I'll change that and resubmit after testing.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
