On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:29:44PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 15:12 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the long delay. It took me some time to investigate and test the 
>> code.
>> Currently, the hotplug by qemu monitor command line has been verified. Two 
>> pci
>> device on the same bus have been hotpluged one by one successfully.
>> 
>> Another case in my mind is the EEH hotplug, which requires code in
>> Qemu/Sapphire/Kernel. I will did further test later.
>> 
>> Below is the patch which is verified in guest with monitor command line. If 
>> my
>> understanding is not correct, please let me know :-)
>
>Please verify under pHyp, the code path are a bit different.

Yep, I will test it.

>
>Cheers,
>Ben.
>
>> >From 69c5f014836b24897356731c39cbaf18f4563573 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:28:53 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Use bus->is_added in of_scan_bus() as in
>>  general platform
>> 
>> When scan the pci bus on general platform, it use bus->is_added to mark the
>> bus has been added successfully. While this flag is not used when the bus 
>> scan
>> relies on device node. Instead, it uses a particular parameter
>> "rescan_existing" to play the same role.
>> 
>> This patch enables the bus->is_added when device node is used, drops the
>> "rescan_existing" parameter. Also it skip the pcibios_setup_bus_devices()
>> procedure when bus has already been added, since the pcibios_setup_device()
>> step is done in pci_device_add() when the bus is already added.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c |   14 +++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
>> index 83c26d8..3e943ab 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
>> @@ -334,10 +334,8 @@ static struct pci_dev *of_scan_pci_dev(struct pci_bus 
>> *bus,
>>   * __of_scan_bus - given a PCI bus node, setup bus and scan for child 
>> devices
>>   * @node: device tree node for the PCI bus
>>   * @bus: pci_bus structure for the PCI bus
>> - * @rescan_existing: Flag indicating bus has already been set up
>>   */
>> -static void __of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node, struct pci_bus *bus,
>> -                      int rescan_existing)
>> +static void __of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node, struct pci_bus *bus)
>>  {
>>      struct device_node *child;
>>      struct pci_dev *dev;
>> @@ -356,9 +354,11 @@ static void __of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node, 
>> struct pci_bus *bus,
>>      /* Apply all fixups necessary. We don't fixup the bus "self"
>>       * for an existing bridge that is being rescanned
>>       */
>> -    if (!rescan_existing)
>> +    if (!bus->is_added) {
>>              pcibios_setup_bus_self(bus);
>> -    pcibios_setup_bus_devices(bus);
>> +            pcibios_setup_bus_devices(bus);
>> +            bus->is_added = 1;
>> +    }
>>  
>>      /* Now scan child busses */
>>      list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void __of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node, 
>> struct pci_bus *bus,
>>   */
>>  void of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node, struct pci_bus *bus)
>>  {
>> -    __of_scan_bus(node, bus, 0);
>> +    __of_scan_bus(node, bus);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_scan_bus);
>>  
>> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_scan_bus);
>>   */
>>  void of_rescan_bus(struct device_node *node, struct pci_bus *bus)
>>  {
>> -    __of_scan_bus(node, bus, 1);
>> +    __of_scan_bus(node, bus);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_rescan_bus);
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>> 
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> >Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> >https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>> 
>

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to