Hello Tony,
On 06/09/2014 10:28 AM, Tony wrote: > Thank Emil. > > Where can i find the details about a 'diff' of qman revisions ? Let me look if someody bothered to write an AN about this > The code > i ported doesnt support latest qman revision (REV3). Ported from what (I suspect) SDK release? v1.5 should already have support for the latest xMan revision(s) > Can i still work on > qman REV1.1 for all the latest targets ? (read t-series) I'm inclined to say yes (of course the new features will not be available), but I need to have a look at the code to see with what limitations Cheers, > Regards > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Emil Medve <emilian.me...@freescale.com > <mailto:emilian.me...@freescale.com>> wrote: > > Hello Tony, > > > On 06/09/2014 06:43 AM, Tony wrote: > > How's the fsl,qman-channel-id value different for different targets ? > > Channel ids are assigned in hardware > > > Is there any document on how this value is achieved ? > > They are described in the RM of each SoC and in the DPAA RM > > > Or can it be any value ??? > > Nope. It must be the right value or frames will end up in the wrong > portal or worse > > > Cheers, > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
