On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 17:11 -0500, Cody P Schafer wrote: >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Cody P Schafer <d...@codyps.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:45 AM, David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> >> > wrote: >> >> From: Cody P Schafer >> >>> Rather manually specifying the size of the integer to be converted, key >> >>> off of the type size. Reduces duplicate size info and the occurance of >> >>> certain types of bugs (using the wrong sized conversion). >> >> ... >> >>> +#define be_to_cpu(v) \ >> >>> + __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(v) == sizeof(uint8_t) , v, \ >> >>> + __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(v) == sizeof(uint16_t), >> >>> be16_to_cpu(v), \ >> >>> + __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(v) == sizeof(uint32_t), >> >>> be32_to_cpu(v), \ >> >>> + __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(v) == sizeof(uint64_t), >> >>> be64_to_cpu(v), \ >> >>> + (void)0)))) >> >> ... >> >> >> >> I'm not at all sure that using the 'size' of the constant will reduce >> >> the number of bugs - it just introduces a whole new category of bugs. >> > >> > Certainly, if you mis-size the argument (and thus have missized one of >> > the variables containing the be value, probably a bug anyhow), there >> > will be problems. >> > >> > I put this interface together because of an actual bug I wrote into >> > the initial code of the hv_24x7 driver (resized a struct member >> > without adjusting the be*_to_cpu() sizing). >> > Having this "auto sizing" macro means I can avoid encoding the size of >> > a struct field in multiple places. >> >> To clarify, the point I'm making here is that this simply cuts out 1 >> more place we can screw up endianness conversion sizing. > > It does screw up other types when you do things like: > > u8 foo = some_function(); > > cpu_to_be(foo + 1); > > the return value is sizeof(int) not u8
Yep, that is a very good argument against the cpu_to_{be,le}() variants. It might make sense to remove them and just have the {be,le}_to_cpu() ones. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev