Jiri Olsa [jo...@redhat.com] wrote: | | yep, that sounds more clear to me.. something like below? | | calling callchain_dup from within arch_adjust_callchain in case | you want to change it and returning != 0 in this case, so | we could free the new callchain
Agree. | | but it might be to much overhead in case you have the support to skip | just one entry now right? is there a plan for more cleaning? ;) Its only one entry AFACIT. No plans for other changes, so will rename the function as you mention in the other message and will resend. Thanks, Sukadev _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
