On 20.05.14 10:28, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:37:24PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 10:22 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:33:10PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 14:11 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch adds new IOCTL command VFIO_EEH_INFO to VFIO container
to support EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been
passed from host to guest via VFIO.
[...]
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
index cb9023d..1fd1bfb 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
@@ -455,6 +455,63 @@ struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_info {
#define VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)
+/*
+ * The VFIO EEH info struct provides way to support EEH functionality
+ * for PCI device that is passed from host to guest via VFIO.
+ */
+#define VFIO_EEH_OP_MAP 0
+#define VFIO_EEH_OP_UNMAP 1
+#define VFIO_EEH_OP_SET_OPTION 2
+#define VFIO_EEH_OP_GET_ADDR 3
+#define VFIO_EEH_OP_GET_STATE 4
+#define VFIO_EEH_OP_PE_RESET 5
+#define VFIO_EEH_OP_PE_CONFIG 6
Is this really an "info" ioctl?
Yeah, "VFIO_EEH_INFO" isn't a good name. How about to have "VFIO_EEH_HANDLER" ?
VFIO_EEH_OP perhaps. Thanks,
Ok. Will rename it to VFIO_EEH_OP in next revision.
Is there any benefit of a multiplexing EEH ioctl over just 7 individual
ioctls?
Alex
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
