On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hu...@google.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't FAULT_AROUND_ORDER and fault_around_order be changed to be > the order of the fault-around size in bytes, and fault_around_pages() > use 1UL << (fault_around_order - PAGE_SHIFT) Yes. And shame on me for missing it (this time!) at review. There's still time to fix this. Patches, please. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
