On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 18:58 +0300, Diana Craciun wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt > index 922c30a..09dbc5f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt > @@ -20,3 +20,11 @@ PROPERTIES > a property named fsl,eref-[CAT], where [CAT] is the abbreviated category > name with all uppercase letters converted to lowercase, indicates that > the category is supported by the implementation. > + > + - fsl,portid-mapping : <u32> > + The Coherency Subdomain ID Port Mapping Registers and Snoop ID Port > Mapping > + registers which are part of the CoreNet Coherency fabric (CCF) provide a > + CoreNet Coherency Subdomain ID/CoreNet Snoop ID to cpu mapping > functions. > + Certain bits from these registers should be set if the coresponding CPU > + should be snooped. This property defines a bitmask which selects the > bit that > + should be set if this cpu should be snooped.
Please follow existing formatting in this file. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pamu.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pamu.txt > index 1f5e329..827c637 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pamu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pamu.txt > @@ -26,6 +26,13 @@ Required properties: > A standard property. > - #size-cells : <u32> > A standard property. > +- fsl,portid-mapping : <u32> > + The Coherency Subdomain ID Port Mapping Registers and Snoop ID Port > Mapping > + registers which are part of the CoreNet Coherency fabric (CCF) provide a > + CoreNet Coherency Subdomain ID/CoreNet Snoop ID to pamu mapping > functions. > + Certain bits from these registers should be set if PAMUs should be > snooped. > + This property defines a bitmask which selects the bits that should be > set > + if PAMUs should be snooped. This can't be a required property since existing trees don't have it -- in addition to allowing for the possibility of a PAMU where the snoop ID is not known or where the snoop domain mechanism does not exist. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
