On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:14:13PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> In KVM guests on Power, in a guest not backed by hugepages, we see the
> following:
>
> AnonHugePages: 0 kB
> HugePages_Total: 0
> HugePages_Free: 0
> HugePages_Rsvd: 0
> HugePages_Surp: 0
> Hugepagesize: 64 kB
>
> HPAGE_SHIFT == 0 in this configuration, which indicates that hugepages
> are not supported at boot-time, but this is only checked in
> hugetlb_init(). Extract the check to a helper function, and use it in a
> few relevant places.
>
> This does make hugetlbfs not supported (not registered at all) in this
> environment. I believe this is fine, as there are no valid hugepages and
> that won't change at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <n...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
This patch looks ok but the changelog misses important information from
the original report which is probably why it fell through the cracks.
Add the fact that you encountered a problem during mount to the changelog
and resend it directly to Andrew. This part from your original report;
Currently, I am seeing the following when I `mount -t hugetlbfs
/none /dev/hugetlbfs`, and then simply do a `ls /dev/hugetlbfs`. I
think it's related to the fact that hugetlbfs is properly not
correctly setting itself up in this state?:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000031
Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000245710
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
....
It probably slipped through the cracks because from the changelog this
looks like a minor formatting issue and not a functional fix.
>
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index d19b30a..cc8fcc7 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -1017,6 +1017,11 @@ static int __init init_hugetlbfs_fs(void)
> int error;
> int i;
>
> + if (!hugepages_supported()) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "hugetlbfs: Disabling because there are no
> supported hugepage sizes\n");
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> error = bdi_init(&hugetlbfs_backing_dev_info);
> if (error)
> return error;
KERN_ERR feels like overkill for this type of issue. KERN_INFO?
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
