On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:10:20PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > Since we added fours clock to the DT binding, we should update the current > SAI dts/dtsi so as not to break their functions. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <guangyu.c...@freescale.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi > index d31ce1b..9fd0007 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi > @@ -139,8 +139,10 @@ > compatible = "fsl,vf610-sai"; > reg = <0x40031000 0x1000>; > interrupts = <0 86 0x04>; > - clocks = <&clks VF610_CLK_SAI2>; > - clock-names = "sai"; > + clocks = <&clks VF610_CLK_SAI2>, > + <&clks VF610_CLK_SAI2>, > + <&clks 0>, <&clks 0>;
So it seems that SAI on vf610 does work with only one clock. So the driver change will break old DTB for vf610? If that's case, we will have to need a new compatible for cases where 4 clocks are needed. Shawn > + clock-names = "bus", "mclk1", "mclk2", "mclk3"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > > -- > 1.8.4 > > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
