On 27 March 2014 15:00, Gautham R Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > As of now, I prefer this patch be based on code that is in the -next > tree. I'll get rid of the per-core locking once the serialization > patch of the core is accepted.
Okay, its pushed in -next now :) _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
