Scott, > On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 12:15 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > > These are always breaking and I feel like I'm the only one fixing them > > and > > Always? Please elaborate.
Maybe once every 2-3 months I have to send a fix up for them. > > I don't even have one of these boards so let's just remove them. > > What does you having one of these boards have to do with anything? Well it feels like I'm the only one fixing them (which I guess isn't true), and I don't even really care about them. > > They are also broken right now in linux-next when compiling modules. > > A fix for that breakage is in i2c.git i2c/for-current (commit > 5f12c5eca6e6b7aeb4b2028d579f614b4fe7a81f). I sent the patch to fix it > (I guess you're not "the only one fixing them") the day I found out > about the breakage. The breakage was introduced by commits from the i2c > tree, including one late in the rc cycle that enables a driver that > hadn't been enabled in a while (let's not do that again please). Great. > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org> > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig > > b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig > > deleted file mode 100644 > > index 19f0fbe..0000000 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig > > +++ /dev/null > > @@ -1,272 +0,0 @@ > > NACK Fair enough. It was more of a probe to see who really cared about them. Clearly someone does. > I'm curious why you only removed this one defconfig when > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig had the same problem... Should have been both.. I screwed that up. Mikey _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
